Factors influencing structure and function of intracerebral grafts in the mammalian brain: a review

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
After twenty years of intensive research, the possibility to induce recovery from various disorders in brain damaged mammals by means of intracerebral grafts of fetal CNS tissue is well documented and largely accepted by the scientific community. However, there are several reports on animal research suggesting that intracerebral grafts may fail to induce the expected recovery after brain injury or even that they may cause deficits which are actually more pronounced than those induced by the lesions alone. In addition, attempts to produce functional benefits with catecholamine-releasing tissue grafts in the brain of Parkinsonian patients have given limited and variable results; graft-induced deleterious effects have also been occasionally reported in a few clinical cases. One way to progress towards a better understanding of such disappointing, although informative, discrepancies between successful and less successful experimental studies and clinical trials would be to consider that there are several factors which may influence, in one direction or the other, the survival, development, integration and functional expression of intracerebral fetal CNS grafts. The present review considers the following factors: (i) some of the technical factors such as the constraints of transplantation surgery, the origin of donor tissue, the implantation site, the age of both the donor and the recipient, and tissue manipulations prior to grafting (i.e., cryopreservation, culture, genetic modification); (ii) exogenous and endogenous neurotrophic factors, the latter being distinguished by whether they may be host- or graft-derived; (iii) immunological factors (from the particular immunological status of the brain to some effects of immunosuppression in the case of xenografting)’, (iv) pharmacological factors, with a particular focus on experimental data suggesting that administration of drugs may or might contribute to elicit, enhance or block some functional effects of grafts. It is concluded that all these factors may become simultaneously operative and interacting, thereby presiding over the functional outcome of intracerebral grafting in both experimental research and clinical trials.