Specialist general practitioners and diabetes clinics in primary care: a qualitative and descriptive evaluation
- 28 November 2003
- journal article
- website
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 21 (1) , 32-38
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01063.x
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate an innovative approach to the provision of primary care‐based diabetes services in Bradford, UK. The service model differs from others in comprising 19 clinics which offer a specialist service, intermediate between primary and secondary care, to all patients within the Bradford area. Methods The study included: analysis of referral, attendance and register data; questionnaires to general practitioners (GPs) and specialist clinic providers; qualitative interviews with clinic and other professional staff and patients; and an economic analysis. Results The 19 clinics adopt a range of organizational models. In the first 3½ years, 2415 patients were referred. There was a significant reduction in out‐patient attendances at hospital, but also a significant increase in overall patient attendances. Specialist clinic patients differed from hospital patients in being older and having had diabetes for longer since diagnosis. Ten of the 14 clinics run by practising GPs attracted more referrals from within their practices than from outside. GPs and patients across the city believed the clinics were valuable, the main benefits being geographical accessibility, availability of specialists in a community setting, short waiting times for first appointments at most clinics, and continuity of staff. Their reservations included a lack of strategic planning in the location of clinics, long waiting times at some clinics, and poor communication at some clinics with referring GPs. The cost of the primary care clinics is similar to hospital clinics. Conclusions This model of specialist primary care services offers an opportunity to develop diabetes services that are convenient to patients, popular with practitioners, and increase capacity. However, the shortcomings as well as the advantages of the model need to be addressed if it is to be implemented elsewhere or for other patient groups.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative data analysis for applied policy researchPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2010
- A service users’ research advisory group from the perspectives of both service users and researchersHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2002
- Adoption of disease management model for diabetes in region of MaastrichtBMJ, 2001
- Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes.Family Practice, 2001
- Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials Commentary: Meta-analysis is a blunt and potentially misleading instrument for analysing models of service deliveryBMJ, 1998
- Comprehensive Diabetes Care in North TynesideDiabetic Medicine, 1995
- Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?Social Science & Medicine, 1994
- Quality assessment in health.BMJ, 1984