Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) versus coronary artery stenting for elective revascularization of the left anterior descending artery
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 90 (8) , 885-887
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02715-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- One-Year Clinical Outcome After Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery BypassCirculation, 2000
- Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency and flow reserve after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypassThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Angiographic results after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach1European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Facing the Era of Minimally Invasive Coronary Grafting: Current Results of Conventional Bypass Grafting for Single-Vessel DiseaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Less invasive arterial CABG on a beating heartThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Resource utilization for minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypassThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Direct Myocardial Revascularization without Extracorporeal CirculationChest, 1991