FUN
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
- Vol. 19 (3) , 21-24
- https://doi.org/10.1145/49108.1045604
Abstract
We are in many ways just getting started on the problem of developing a set of concepts and a vocabulary for describing the quality of software and in particular its usability. Consider: easy to use, easy to learn, user friendly, productive, fun. How do these, and other terms used to describe software differ; how do they overlap? In this paper, we examine the confusion between being fun and being easy, as these terms are applied to end-user software and systems. This confusion is interesting in that we can ask how such a circumstance might have ever occurred. It is challenging in that we need to separately clarify the concepts of ease and fun, if they are to provide us any analytical leverage in understanding software quality.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- LisaLearningComputer, 1986
- The adventure of getting to know a computerComputer, 1982
- Metaphor and the Cognitive Representation of Computing SystemsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1982
- Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*Cognitive Science, 1981
- Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonancePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957