Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 65 (9) , 934-939
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklistsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- GRADE system: new paradigmCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2010
- Measuring the global burden of low back painBest Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- The Prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic reviewBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2007
- The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literatureEuropean Spine Journal, 2005
- Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-makingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Evidence Of Evidence-Based Health Policy: The Politics Of Systematic Reviews In Coverage DecisionsHealth Affairs, 2005
- The Prevalence of Low Back Pain in the Literature A Structured Review of 26 Nordic Studies From 1954 to 1993Spine, 1995
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968