Postpositivist Inquiry: Implications of the "New Philosophy of Science" for the Field of the Education of the Gifted
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gifted Child Quarterly
- Vol. 34 (4) , 161-167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400406
Abstract
In this paper I sketch the outlines of an emerging postpositivist paradigm for inquiry and research. This new paradigm is the product of recent thinking in philosophy, the natural sciences, and the social sciences—the so-called "new philosophy of science" (Phillips, 1987)— and has been embraced primarily, but not exclusively, by investigators using qualitative methods. Drawing heavily upon the work of Lincoln and Guba (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Guba & Lincoln, 1989), I delineate the axioms (basic beliefs) underlying this approach and then consider the methodological implications that follow logically from the axioms. Finally, I suggest some applications of postpositivist inquiry in the field of the education of the gifted.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative Research: A Defense of TraditionsReview of Educational Research, 1989
- Qualitative Assessment of Gifted EducationGifted Child Quarterly, 1987
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- Issues in Evaluating Programs for the GiftedGifted Child Quarterly, 1983
- Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiryECTJ, 1982
- Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1975