A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees
- 18 March 2002
- journal article
- costing methodology
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 11 (3) , 221-231
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.648
Abstract
Most studies on the indirect costs of an illness and the cost effectiveness of a medical intervention or employer‐sponsored wellness program assume that the value of reducing the number of days employees miss from work due to illness is the wage rate. This paper presents a general model to examine the magnitude and incidence of costs associated with absenteeism under alternative assumptions regarding the size of the firm, the production function, the nature of the firm's product, and the competitiveness of the labor market. We conclude that the cost of lost work time can be substantially higher than the wage when perfect substitutes are not available to replace absent workers and there is team production or a penalty associated with not meeting an output target. In the long run, workers are likely to bear much of the incidence of the costs associated with absenteeism, and therefore be the likely beneficiaries of any reduction in absenteeism. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring productivity loss days in asthma patientsHealth Economics, 2000
- Avoiding Double-Counting in Pharmacoeconomic StudiesPharmacoEconomics, 1997
- Health Benefits at WorkPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1997
- Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicinePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1996
- The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of diseaseJournal of Health Economics, 1995
- Cost-of-Illness Methodology: A Guide to Current Practices and ProceduresThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1982