Endogenous Growth Theory: Intellectual Appeal and Empirical Shortcomings
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 8 (1) , 55-72
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.55
Abstract
This paper examines whether the recent theoretical insights stemming from endogenous growth theory have provided a better guide to explaining actual growth experience than the neoclassical model. The paper considers the available empirical evidence on a number of related subjects, including the slowing of growth in the OECD countries over the last two decades; the acceleration of growth in several Asian countries since the early 1960s; studies of the determinants of growth in a cross-country context; and sources of the differences in international productivity levels. It concludes that the empirical confirmation, so far, of endogenous growth theory is limited.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992
- Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1992
- Economic Growth in a Cross Section of CountriesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Equipment Investment and Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Economic Integration and Endogenous GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Endogenous Technological ChangeJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- A NEW SET OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF REAL PRODUCT AND PRICE LEVELS ESTIMATES FOR 130 COUNTRIES, 1950–1985Review of Income and Wealth, 1988
- Increasing Returns and Long-Run GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related InnovationsJournal of Political Economy, 1958
- A Contribution to the Theory of Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956