One-sided or two-sided ρ values: which most appropriately address the question of drug efficacy?
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 1 (1) , 133-138
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10543409108835010
Abstract
Whether a one-sided or a two-sided ρ value should be used for reporting the results of an analysis should be determined by the a priori question the investigation seeks to answer. It is concluded that one-sided ρ values are appropriate in clinical trials whose objective is to provide definitive, confirmatory evidence of efficacy of pharmaceutical compounds.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The alternative hypothesis: One-sided or two-sided?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Some thoughts on one-tailed testsControlled Clinical Trials, 1988
- Letter to the editor: Some thoughts on two-tailed testsControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- A new procedure for testing equivalence in comparative bioavailability and other clinical trialsCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1983
- Clinical biostatistics; XXXII. Biologie dependeney, 'hypothesis testing', unilateral probabilities, and other issues in seientifie direetion vs. statistieal duplexityClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1975