Occupational and Educational Goals and Expectations: The Effects of Race and Sex
- 1 December 1975
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 23 (2) , 166-181
- https://doi.org/10.2307/799654
Abstract
The effect of race and sex on the discrepancy between educational as well as occupational goals and expectations is examined among a sample of 812 urban college youth from a mixed social class background. Contrary to expectations, race-sex characteristics do not affect mobility discrepancies. However, when level of aspiration is controlled, differences do emerge among high occupational aspirers, those aiming to be executives or major professionals. Black and particularly black males reveal the least discrepancy. It is suggested that women are not convinced that the opportunity structure is open to them. Moreover, race/sex differences in level of aspiration, along with the importance of this variable in explaining goals-expectation discrepancy, suggest that the effects of discriminatory practices operate through the mechanism of limiting the educational and occupational objectives which young people set for themselves.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Range of Aspirations: A New ApproachSocial Problems, 1974
- New Careers: Bridges or ladders?Social Work, 1973
- The Indiscriminate State of Social Class MeasurementSocial Forces, 1971
- Readiness to SucceedUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1969
- Aspirations, Class and Racial-Ethnic MembershipThe Journal of Negro Education, 1967
- Class and Family Influences on Student AspirationsSocial Forces, 1964
- Aspirations of Negro and White StudentsSocial Forces, 1963
- Sex Differences in Occupational Choice Patterns among Negro AdolescentsSocial Problems, 1962
- The Educational and Occupational Aspirations and Plans of Negro and White Male Elementary School StudentsThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1959
- Social Class and Occupational Aspiration: A Comparison of Absolute and Relative MeasurementAmerican Sociological Review, 1956