Comment: “Science” Rejects Postmodernism
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 31 (8) , 25-27
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x031008025
Abstract
The National Research Council report Scientific Research in Educationclaims to present an inclusive view of science as it responds to federal government attempts to legislate educational research. This author argues, however, that the report in fact narrowly defines scienceas positivism and methodologyas quantitative. These definitions are made possible by the outright rejection of postmodernism and the rejection by omission of other theories including queer, feminist, race, postcolonial, critical, and poststructural theories. The chief issue in this report is, in fact, not “science” but the larger issue of epistemology, from which methodologies like conventional science emerge. After using postmodern analyses to illustrate the danger of the report’s normalizing and totalizing discourse, this author urges researchers to be on guard against those who would reject diverse epistemologies and methodologies in educational researchKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Poststructural feminism in education: An overviewInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2000
- The Call for Intelligibility in Postmodern Educational ResearchEducational Researcher, 2000
- Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive dataInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1997
- Against EthicsPublished by JSTOR ,1993