Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate use ofTypha angustifolia, Phragmites australis, and treatedPhragmites marshes along the lower Connecticut River

This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:

• Vegetation type and the intertidal macroinvertebrate fauna of a brackish marsh: Phragmites vs. Spartina
  Wetlands, 2001
• Effects of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) Invasion on Marsh Surface Macrofauna: Response of Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans
  Estuaries, 2000
• Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America
  Aquatic Botany, 1999
• Comparison of Breder Traps and Seines Used to Sample Marsh Nekton
  Estuaries, 1999
• Impact of the spread ofPhragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes
  Wetlands, 1999
• Does invasion of oligohaline tidal marshes by reed grass, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., affect the availability of prey resources for the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus L.?
  Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1998
• Gut Contents of Common Mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus L., in a Restored Impounded Marsh and in Natural Reference Marshes
  Estuaries, 1994
• Coarse woody debris as a refuge from predation in aquatic communities
  Oecologia, 1993
• Aspects of an Undescribed Reproductive Behavior in Fundulus heteroclitus (Pisces: Cyprinodontae) from Virginia
  Chesapeake Science, 1975
• THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM AND ITS FUNCTION INFUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS
  The Biological Bulletin, 1928