Development and regulation of monoclonal antibody products: Challenges and opportunities
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
- Vol. 24 (4) , 569-584
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-005-6196-y
Abstract
An increasing number of monoclonal antibodies for cancer diagnosis and treatment are in clinical use and in the development pipeline, with more expected as new molecular targets are identified. As with all drugs, product quality, an appropriate pre-clinical pharmacology-toxicology testing program, and well-designed clinical trials are essential for a successful drug development program. However, protein products such as monoclonal antibodies present unique regulatory concerns. The derivation from biological sources as well as the constantly evolving technologies utilized to develop these products demands continuous appraisal of safety concerns, even while the accumulated experience with these protein products has facilitated their safety evaluations. Because of the complex nature of these products and their inherent heterogeneity, a mechanistic understanding of the mode of action along with careful attention to product design and manufacture are critical to assuring a safe, effective and consistent product. Protein products may be highly species specific, thus pharmacologically relevant animal models are an important component in accurately assessing pre-clinical safety and establishing initial dosing. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of protein products can impact its safety profile, dose exposure, and efficacy. Mechanistic insight should form the basis of biological assays used for monitoring efficacy, safety, lot-to-lot consistency and manufacturing changes. The inherent uniqueness of each product necessitates a flexible case-by-case approach for biologics review that is based on a strong scientific understanding of relative risks. This review will provide an overview of approaches used in the development of antibody-based cancer therapeutics and the scientific basis of regulatory reviews.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nanotechnology for the biologistJournal of Leukocyte Biology, 2005
- Polymorphisms in FcγRIIIA (CD16) Receptor Expression Are Associated With Clinical Response to Rituximab in Waldenström’s MacroglobulinemiaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Two Immunoglobulin G Fragment C Receptor Polymorphisms Independently Predict Response to Rituximab in Patients With Follicular LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcγRIIIa geneBlood, 2002
- TrastuzumabDrugs, 2002
- IgG4 breaking the rulesImmunology, 2002
- Induction of CA125-Specific B and T Cell Responses in Patients Injected with MAb-B43.13—Evidence for Antibody-Mediated Antigen-Processing and Presentation of CA125 in VivoCancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals, 2001
- Antibody humanization: a case of the ‘Emperor’s new clothes’?Immunology Today, 2000
- Using an analogous monoclonal antibody to evaluate the reproductive and chronic toxicity potential for a humanized anti-TNFa monoclonal antibodyHuman & Experimental Toxicology, 2000
- Safety Assessment of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals: ICH and BeyondToxicologic Pathology, 1999