Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Versus Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group
- 15 June 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (12) , 2348-2356
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.10.576
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin [GVP]) prolongs overall survival in comparison to cisplatin-free chemotherapy (gemcitabine and vinorelbine [GV]) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Between September 1999 and June 2001, 300 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease were randomly assigned to receive GV (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or GVP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2 every 3 weeks). Primary end point of the study was overall survival. Results: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (GV, 143 patients; GVP, 144 patients) were eligible for analysis. At the time of analysis, April 15, 2002, 209 patients (GV, 103 patients; GVP, 106 patients) of 287 patients had died (73%). No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival (P = .73; median survival, 35.9 versus 32.4 weeks; 1-year survival rate, 33.6% versus 27.5%) as well as for event-free survival (P = .35; median time-to-event, 19.3 versus 22.3 weeks) between GV and GVP. Two hundred fourteen patients were assessable for best response. The overall response rates were 13.0% for GV versus 28.3% for GVP (P = .004; complete responders, 0% versus 3.8%; partial responders, 13.0% versus 24.5%). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the GV treatment arm compared with GVP. No statistically significant difference in quality of life was observed. Conclusion: In this phase III study, the cisplatin-based GVP regimen showed no survival benefit as first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC when compared with the cisplatin-free GV regimen, which was substantially better tolerated.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus a Cisplatin-Based Triplet Versus Nonplatinum Sequential Doublets in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Spanish Lung Cancer Group Phase III Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine Compared With Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine or Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Italian GEMVIN Investigators and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinomaCancer, 2000
- Gemcitabine—a safety reviewAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1998
- 32 Single-agent Gemzar® (Gemcitabine, GEM) versus cisplatin plus etoposide (CE): A randomized phase II study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Lung Cancer, 1997
- Vinorelbine: an overviewCancer Treatment Reviews, 1996
- Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1995