Comparison of Disintegrins with Limited Variation in the RGD Loop in Their Binding to Purified Integrins αIIbβ3, αVβ3 and α5β1 and in Cell Adhesion Inhibition

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The inhibitory capacities of six different disintegrins and one related neurotoxin analogue for the binding of RGD-dependent integrins to either fibrinogen, vitronectin or fibronectin were compared in solid phase assays. Echistatin and flavoridin were the most active inhibitors for αVβ3 and α5β1 integrins and moderately exceeded the activity of the natural protein ligands. The same disintegrins together with eristostatin, bitistatin and barbourin were also very potent inhibitors of fibrinogen binding to αIIbβ3 integrin. For all three integrins, albolabrin showed the lowest affinity, but it still clearly exceeded that of synthetic GRGDS. However, assay conditions may determine these relative affinities, as shown for the αIIbβ3 and αVβ3 integrins when used either in immobilized or soluble form. For αIIbβ3, however, a close correlation was found between KD values determined in platelet binding assays and the concentrations required for half maximal inhibition of three disintegrins. The inhibiting capacity of disintegrins in assays with purified integrins also correlated reasonably well with their inhibition of cell attachment to RGD-dependent protein substrates. However, sequence differences in the RGD loops of the various disintegrins may not fully account for the 20–100-fold difference in their binding capacities. This was particularly evident for echistatin and albolabrin, which differ in this region only by two conservative substitutions but have considerably different inhibitory activities. More remote regions of the disintegrins and alignment of disulfide bridges are therefore likely to contribute to their affinity and selectivity.