The First “Great Leap Forward” Reconsidered: Lessons of Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Slavic Review
- Vol. 39 (4) , 559-587
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2496497
Abstract
From 1928 to 1933, the Soviet Union underwent a radical metamorphosis. Almost overnight the economic order of N E P was abandoned in favor of an untested system of economic relations commonly referred to today as command planning. The magnitude of this transformation, the ideological passions it aroused, and the questionable character of official Soviet statistics during the First Five-Year Plan have all made it exceedingly difficult to conceptualize the process of Soviet industrialization in its entirety. As a consequence, most analyses of Soviet industrialization have been highly eclectic, predicated on assumptions which only appear plausible because they have not been interpreted from the standpoint of a closed model, or of an encompassing theory.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Did the Agricultural Surplus Provide the Resources for the Increase in Investment in the USSR During the First Five Year Plan?The Economic Journal, 1975
- Purges and Production: Soviet Economic Growth, 1928–1940The Journal of Economic History, 1975
- Mass Collectivization and the Contribution of Soviet Agriculture to the First Five-Year Plan: A Review ArticleSlavic Review, 1974
- The Overambitious First Soviet Five-Year PlanSlavic Review, 1973
- Soviet rapid development and the agricultural surplus hypothesisSoviet Studies, 1970
- Factory and Manager in the USSRPublished by Harvard University Press ,1957
- Arithmancy, Theomancy, and the Soviet EconomyJournal of Political Economy, 1953
- Soviet StatisticsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1950
- The Soviet Indices of Industrial ProductionThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1947
- Intricacies of Russian National-Income IndexesJournal of Political Economy, 1947