Factors Influencing Postoperative Morbidity, Mortality, and Survival After Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 223 (4) , 384-394
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199604000-00007
Abstract
OBJECTIVE; Morbidity and mortality involved in the resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. The clinicopathologic and laboratory parameters that might influence the patient's survival also were re-evaluated. Although much progress has been made in the diagnosis and management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, long-term outlook for most patients remains poor. Surgical resection is usually prohibited because of its local invasiveness, and most patients can only be managed by palliative drainage. Recently, many surgeons have adopted a more aggressive resection with varying degrees of success. Several prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma have been proposed; however, no reports have specifically focused on resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic survival factors using multivariate analysis. The clinical records and pathologic slides of 49 cases with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated for their correlation with postoperative morbidity and mortality, whereas 31 variables were evaluated for their significance with postoperative survival. Variables showing statistical significance in the first univariate analysis were included in the following multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic regression test for factors affecting morbidity and mortality and Cox stepwise proportional hazard model for factors influencing survival. There were 5 in-hospital deaths, and the cumulative 5-year survival rate in 44 patients who survived was 14.9%, with a median survival of 14.0 months. Multivariate analysis disclosed that co-existent hepatolithiasis and lower serum asparate aminotransferase levels ( or = 10 mg/dL, 2) curative resection, 3) histologic type, 4) perineural invasion, 5) liver invasion, 6) depth of cancer invasion, 7) positive proximal resected margin, and 8) positive surgical margin. However, multivariate analysis disclosed total bilirubin > or = 10 mg/dL, curative resection, and histologic type as the three most significant independent variables. Surgical resection provides the best survival for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. An adequate nutritional support to increase serum albumin over 3 g/dL is the most important factor to decrease postoperative mortality. Moreover, preoperative biliary drainage to decrease jaundice and a curative resection with adequate surgical margin are recommended if longer survival is anticipated. Patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma seem to survive longer compared to those with moderately or poorly differentiated tumors.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management Strategies in Resection for Hilar CholangiocarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tractBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Clinicopathological Aspects of High Bile Duct CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1984
- Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: The results of a controlled trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: a review of 373 patients.Gut, 1983
- Prediction of risk in biliary surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Evaluation of Aggressive Surgery for Carcinoma of the Extrahepatic Bile DuctsAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- Carcinoma of the Hepatic Hilus Surgical Management and the Case for ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 1979
- Twelve Yearsʼ Experience with Transhepatic lntubationAnnals of Surgery, 1974
- Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1965