Comparison of four strategies for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 110 (1) , 33-40
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00598-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosisJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1999
- Making Decisions About Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Disease: Decision Analytic and Costeffectiveness IssuesChest, 1998
- SimpliRED D-dimer can reduce the diagnostic tests in suspected deep vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1998
- Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort studyBMJ, 1998
- DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS: COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EVALUATION, ULTRASOUND, PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, AND VENOSCAN WITH X-RAY VENOGRAMThe Lancet, 1984
- Adjusted Subcutaneous Heparin versus Warfarin Sodium in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Roentgen Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis in the LegArchives of Surgery, 1972
- NATURAL HISTORY OF POSTOPERATIVE DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSISThe Lancet, 1969
- ANTICOAGULANT DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISMThe Lancet, 1960