Interrupted and continuous microarteriorrhaphy techniques: A hemodynamic comparison
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 2 (4) , 419-424
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100020415
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare interrupted and continuous suturing techniques in laboratory microarteriorrhaphy. The comparison was based on rat femoral artery hemodynamic variables, including blood velocities, lumen diameters, and calculated blood flow. These variables were calculated by an offline computer from Doppler frequency shifts that were measured by a 20-MHz pulsed ultrasonic Doppler velocity meter. No statistical difference was noted postoperatively between the interrupted and continuous techniques relative to any hemodynamic variable. Average blood flow after the interrupted (n = 12) and continuous (n = 12) techniques was 6.59 +/- 1.12 and 6.74 +/- 1.20 ml/min, respectively. The two microarteriorrhaphy techniques result in equal postoperative vessel hemodynamics in a laboratory model.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic response of small arteries to topical lignocaineJournal of Surgical Research, 1981
- Hemodynamics after microsurgical anastomosis: The effects of topical lidocaineMicrosurgery, 1981
- High‐frequency pulsed doppler ultrasound: A new tool for microvascular surgeryMicrosurgery, 1979
- An experimental study of microvascular patency using a continuous suture techniqueBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1979
- An ultrasonic pulsed Doppler system for measuring blood flow in small vessels.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1974
- Microvascular SurgerySurgical Clinics of North America, 1967
- MicrosurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1966
- Repair and Replacement of Small Arteries, Microsuture TechniqueJournal of Neurosurgery, 1966