Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 237 (2) , 235-245
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000048551.32606.73
Abstract
To examine the clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem, a novel beta-lactam agent with wide activity against common pathogens encountered in intraabdominal infection. Ertapenem has a pharmacokinetic profile and antimicrobial spectrum that support the potential for use as a once-a-day agent for the treatment of common mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. METHODS This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam as therapy following adequate surgical management of complicated intraabdominal infections. Six hundred thirty-three patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, with 396 meeting all criteria for the evaluable population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was most common (approximately 60% in microbiologically evaluable population). A prospective, expert panel review was conducted to assess the adequacy of surgical source control in patients who were failures as a component of evaluability. For the modified intent-to-treat groups, 245 of 311 patients treated with ertapenem (79.3%) were cured, as were 232 of 304 (76.2) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. One hundred seventy-six of 203 microbiologically evaluable patients treated with ertapenem (86.7%) were cured, as were 157 of the 193 (81.2%) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. In this study, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g once a day was equivalent to piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hours in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety and tolerability profile to piperacillin/tazobactam. A formal process for review of adequacy of source control was found to be of benefit. The results of this trial suggest that ertapenem may be a useful option that could eliminate the need for combination and/or multidosed antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of intraabdominal infections.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Vitro Activities of Ertapenem (MK-0826) against Recent Clinical Bacteria Collected in Europe and AustraliaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- In Vitro Activities of Ertapenem (MK-0826) against Clinical Bacterial Isolates from 11 North American Medical CentersAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- General Guidelines for the Clinical Evaluation of Anti-Infective Drug ProductsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Evaluation of New Anti-Infective Drugs for the Treatment of Intraabdominal InfectionsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Enterococcal Infections in Surgical Patients: The Mystery ContinuesClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Antibiotic Treatment for Surgical PeritonitisAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Results of a Multicenter Trial Comparing Imipenem/Cilastatin to Tobramycin/Clindamycin for Intra-abdominal InfectionsAnnals of Surgery, 1990
- Matched Case-Control Study of Adjusted versus Nonadjusted Gentamicin Dosing in Perforated and Gangrenous AppendicitisTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1986
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Perforated and Gangrenous Appendicitis: An Analysis of Antibiotic FailuresThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983