Workers′ Objectives in Quality Improvement
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Employee Relations
- Vol. 12 (6) , 11-16
- https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459010135848
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to show, through a case study, that the reasons motivating members and non-members of a quality circle to improve quality are not limited to those formulated in the literature. We thereby concur with Fiona Wilson who, in an article published in a recent issue of Employee Relations, showed that the psychological reward is not enough. In the workshops under study, members and non-members obtained better working conditions – for example lay-offs have stopped, transfer of employees from one workshop to another or from one job station to another is a thing of the past – by improving quality through the direct impact that their action was having on the organisation's position in the market and, consequently, on the increase of production volumes.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Productive Efficiency and the Employment Relationship – The Case of Quality CirclesEmployee Relations, 1989
- Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes of Participation in Quality Circles: Conceptual and Empirical FindingsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1988
- Employee Involvement: The Implications of Noninvolvement by UnionsILR Review, 1987
- Employee participation in a Quality Circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- QUALITY CIRCLES AND EMPLOYEE ATTITUDESPersonnel Psychology, 1985
- The Decision To Participate in Quality CirclesThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1985
- Locating problems with quality circlesNational Productivity Review, 1984
- Can quality circles survive in the United States?Business Horizons, 1984
- Forging institutional links: Making quality circles work in the U.S.National Productivity Review, 1984
- ‘AFTER JAPAN’: THE QUALITY CIRCLE TRANSPLANT AND PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCYBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1983