Social change and social conflict in nineteenth?century England: The use of the open?closed village model
- 1 July 1983
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Vol. 10 (4) , 253-262
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158308438215
Abstract
Following earlier articles on social change and conflict in rural England 1780–1850, we assert the relevance of the open‐closed model of social structure, particularly to the study of Burwash by Wells [1981]. This paper demonstrates that no parish was insulated from economic and other influences exerted in and by neighbouring parishes. More especially, although open parishes challenged the upper Establishment, they were not devoid of internal strife, since different interests were not subject to the overriding influence of the large landowners who dominated the populations of closed parishes.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Conflict and Protest in the English Countryside in the early Nineteenth Century: A RejoinderThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1981
- Social protest in a rural society: The spatial diffusion of the Captain Swing disturbances of 1830–1831Journal of Historical Geography, 1981
- The development of the english rural proletariat and social protest, 1700–1850: A comment1The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1980
- The development of the English rural proletariat and social protest, 1700–1850The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1979
- Wealden Gunfounding: An Analysis of Its Demise in the Eighteenth CenturyThe Economic History Review, 1976