Psychometrics and Event-Related Potentials in the Diagnosis of Dementia
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Gerontology
- Vol. 41 (2) , 154-162
- https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/41.2.154
Abstract
This study attempted to increase the reliability of predicting the normal latency of the P3 component in elderly adults. It was hypothesized this would allow a more accurate distinction to be made between normal adults (n = 20) and patients with dementia (n = 19) on the basis of observed P3 latencies. Two models for predicting latency were assessed. The first, which used age alone as a predictor, explained 18% of the normal variation in latency and misclassified 40% of the patients. The second model, which incorporated scores on psychometric tests, explained 74% of latency variation and misclassified 20% of the patients. Scores on the similarities subtest of the WAIS and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, however, correctly identified 92% of the patients. This finding casts doubt on the justification of the P3 latency measures to diagnose dementia.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the value of P300 Event-Related Potentials in the Differential Diagnosis of DementiaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1984
- Psychometric Differentiation of Mild Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer TypeArchives of Neurology, 1984
- Auditory averaged evoked potentials and aging: Factors of stimulus, task and topographyBiological Psychology, 1980
- Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980
- Age Effects on Event-related Potentials in a Selective Attention TaskJournal of Gerontology, 1979
- Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjectsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978