How Much of the Clinical Predictability of Dangerousness Issue is Due to Language and Communication Difficulties?: Some Sample Courtroom Questions and Some Inspired but Heady Answers
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
- Vol. 28 (3) , 159-167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x8402800302
Abstract
If the golfer hits many golf balls but always in a dense fog so that he does not know how the shots really turn out, and therefore, he has no opportunity for making such corrections as might be necessary, it is unlikely that the fact that he has hit several golf balls, under such circumstances, will result in improving his game. Similarly, when a psychiatrist makes many diagnostic evaluations but lacks the opportu nity or fails to follow up his diagnostic conclusions to determine whether or not they were, in fact, and by objective indices, correct, his diagnostic accuracy is not likely to improve (Ziskin, 1975, p. 216).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Supreme Court looks at psychiatryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1984
- Clinical Evaluation of the "Dangerousness" of "Normal" Criminal DefendantsVirginia Law Review, 1980
- Expressions of Probability: Words and NumbersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- A look at psychiatric decision makingAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1978
- Dangerousness: A paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology.American Psychologist, 1978
- The Evaluation of Clinical PredictionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977