Activation of human respiratory muscles during different voluntary manoeuvres.
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 428 (1) , 387-403
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018218
Abstract
1. This study used three techniques (bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation, motor cortex stimulation and quantitative electromyography) to assess the degree of activation of the diaphragm, intercostal-accessory muscles and abdominal muscles during postural tasks and respiratory manoeuvres. They included maximal inspiratory and expulsive efforts. 2. Bilateral phrenic nerve stimuli at supramaximal levels produced an average change in transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) of 28 cmH2O during relaxation. During maximal inspiratory or expulsive efforts, all subjects were able to activate the diaphragm fully at functional residual capacity as judged by the failure of stimuli delivered during the voluntary efforts to increase Pdi. Peak voluntary Pdi was about 30% less for inspiratory than expulsive manoeuvres. 3. By contrast, transcranial activation of motor cortical output to the diaphragm and abdominal muscles produced an increment in abdominal pressure of 25 .+-. 7 cmH2O during maximal voluntary expulsive efforts. Given the lack of response to phrenic nerve stimulation at similar voluntary pressures, this suggests that abdominal muscles, and not the diaphragm, fail to generate their full contractile force during maximal voluntary expulsive manoeuvres. 4. Motor cortical stimulation during weak inspiratory efforts produced a small reduction in oesophageal pressure (i.e. increase in net inspiratory force) of 7-14 cmH2O. This response could not be extinguished during maximal voluntary inspiratory efforts in two of three subjects. This occurred despite the cortical coactivation of ''antagonist'' muscles in the chest wall and abdomen, and passive transmission of pressure from the abdominal to thoracic compartments. 5. Integrated electromyographic activity (EMG) recorded from abdominal muscles (rectus abdominis, external oblique) was greater during trunk flexion than during maximal expulsive efforts. Similarly, integrated EMG of the interocostal-accessory muscles (sternomastoid, scalenes, parasternal intercostals) was greater during tasks requiring head and/or neck flexion than during the maximal inspiratory efforts. 6. These data show that the diaphragm can be fully activated by the central nervous system during voluntary respiratory tasks but that other agonist ''respiratory'' muscles need not be activated fully. Given the complex actions of ''in-series'' respiratory muscle revealed here, it is argued that differences in the transdiaphragmatic pressure during various postural and respiratory tasks do not necessarily imply variation in the level of diaphragmatic neural drive.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of human motor cortical projections to abdominal muscles and intrinsic muscles of the handExperimental Brain Research, 1989
- Assessment of maximal voluntary contraction with twitch interpolation: an instrument to measure twitch responsesJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1988
- Maximal activation of the human diaphragm but not inspiratory intercostal muscles during static inspiratory effortsNeuroscience Letters, 1988
- Human diaphragmatic endurance during different maximal respiratory efforts.The Journal of Physiology, 1988
- Electrical stimulation over the human vertebral column: which neural elements are excited?Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1986
- Activation of the human diaphragm during maximal static efforts.The Journal of Physiology, 1985
- Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions of three human musclesJournal of Neurophysiology, 1983
- Extent of motor unit activation during effortJournal of Applied Physiology, 1981
- Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractions of vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres.The Journal of Physiology, 1978
- Voluntary strength and fatigueThe Journal of Physiology, 1954