A Prospective Pathologic Analysis Using Whole-Mount Sections of Rectal Cancer Following Preoperative Combined Modality Therapy
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 245 (1) , 88-93
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000232540.82364.43
Abstract
Objective: The aims of this study were to use a comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis to characterize microscopic patterns of residual disease, as well as circumferential and distal resection margins, in rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT; and to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease. Summary Background Data: Recent studies have shown that preoperative combined modality therapy (CMT) for rectal cancer enhances rates of sphincter preservation. However, the efficacy of preoperative CMT in conjunction with a total mesorectal excision (TME)-based resection, in terms of resection margins using whole-mount sections, has not been reported. Furthermore, since patterns of residual disease and extent of distal spread following preoperative CMT are largely unknown, intraoperative determination of distal rectal transection remains a surgical challenge. Methods: We prospectively accrued 109 patients with endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)-staged, locally advanced rectal cancer (T2–T4 and/or N1), located a median distance of 7 cm from the anal verge, requiring preoperative CMT, and undergoing a TME-based resection. Comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis was performed, with particular emphasis on extent of residual disease, margin status, and intramural tumor extension. Clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease were identified. Results: A sphincter-preserving resection was feasible in 87 patients (80%), and in all 109 patients, distal margins were negative (median, 2.1 cm; range, 0.4–10 cm). Intramural extension beyond the gross mucosal edge of residual tumor was observed in only 2 patients (1.8%), both ≤0.95 cm. There were no positive circumferential margins (median, 10 mm; range, 1–28 mm), although 6 were less than or equal to 1 mm. On multivariate analysis, residual disease was observed more frequently in distally located tumors (distance from anal verge P = 0.03). Conclusion: Our comprehensive pathologic analysis suggests that, following preoperative CMT and a TME-based resection, distal margins of 1 cm may provide for complete removal of locally advanced rectal cancer. Although residual cancer following preoperative CMT was more likely in the setting of distally located tumors, occult tumor beneath the mucosal edge was rare and, when present, limited to less than 1 cm. Our results extend the indications for sphincter preservation, as distal resection margins of only 1 cm may be acceptable for rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sphincter-Saving Resection for All Rectal CarcinomasAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Oncological Outcomes After Total Mesorectal Excision for Cure for Cancer of the Lower Rectum: Anterior vs. Abdominoperineal ResectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2004
- Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Adenocarcinoma of the Lower Third of the Rectum Surgically Treated With a <10-MM Distal Clearance: Preliminary Results in 35 N0 PatientsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Distal Margin Requirements After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Distal Rectal Carcinomas: Are ? 1 cm Distal Margins Sufficient?Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intentDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Rectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1998
- Distal intramural spread in adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum treated with total rectal resection and coloanal anastomosisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1997
- Prospective analysis of the distal margin of clearance in anterior resection for rectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTIONThe Lancet, 1986