Ranking Harassment: A Multidimensional Scaling of Sexual Harassment Scenarios
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 129 (1) , 29-39
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914945
Abstract
Despite a recent storm of research on sexual harassment, there is not a useful way to categorize sexual harassment behaviors. Researchers have often relied on the dimension of severity, arranging behaviors in terms of how severe or offensive each behavior is. However, because sexual harassment, by definition, necessarily involves an act that is offensive and severe, we challenge the dimension of severity as the most meaningful categorization. In this exploratory research, we employed multidimensional scaling to analyze the results of a sorting task. Undergraduate women in the United States were asked to sort 18 sexual harassment scenarios. Results suggest a two-dimensional solution, with publicness and traditionality as the proposed dimensions.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: A Re-Examination of Gender DifferencesThe Journal of Psychology, 1990
- The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassmentSex Roles, 1990
- Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority, and gender in a university settingSex Roles, 1989
- Women in Engineering: A Promise Unfulfilled?Social Problems, 1989
- A Hierarchy of Sexual HarassmentThe Journal of Psychology, 1987
- Sexual harassment proclivities in menSex Roles, 1987
- Comment on Crocker's "An Analysis of University Definitions of Sexual Harassment"Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1984
- On the description of subcultural lexicons: A multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- Anderson's Personality-Trait Words Rated by Men and Women as a Function of Stimulus SexPsychological Reports, 1969