Implications of small reference vessel diameter in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization
- 25 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 40-48
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00181-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of Coronary Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Small Coronary ArteriesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Prospective case-control comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel disease treated in 1986–1987 versus 1991: Improved in-hospital and 12-month resultsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Directional coronary atherectomy in women compared with menClinical Cardiology, 1994
- Predicting the risk of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty in an individual patientJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Issues of QCA validation:to the editorCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1994
- Usefulness of quantitative and qualitative angiographic lesion morphology, and clinical characteristics in predicting major adverse cardiac events during and after native coronary balloon angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Comparison of major complication rates with new atherectomy devices for percutaneous coronary intervention in women versus menThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Re-Stenose nach Implantation von Palmaz-Schatz-Gefäßstützen in Koronararterien*Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1993
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data.Circulation, 1983