Wikipedia and academic peer review
- 22 February 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Online Information Review
- Vol. 32 (1) , 73-88
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865994
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a thought experiment, exploring the use of Wikipedia or similar content-malleable systems for the review and dissemination of academic knowledge. Design/methodology/approach – By looking at other sources, the paper considers the current state of the academic peer-review process, discusses Wikipedia and reflects on dynamic content creation and management applications currently in use in academia. Findings – The traditional peer review process must be updated to match the rapid creation and diffusion of knowledge that characterises the 21st century. The Wikipedia concept is a potential model for more rapid and reliable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The implications of such a concept would have a dramatic effect on the academic community. Originality/value – This paper promotes a radical idea for changing the methods by which academic knowledge is both constructed and disseminated.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citing, quoting, and critiquing the WikipediaEnglish Today, 2006
- Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the PastJournal of American History, 2006
- Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journalsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006
- The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheresComputers and Composition, 2005
- Internet encyclopaedias go head to headPublished by Springer Nature ,2005
- The Reliability of Peer Reviews of Papers on Information SystemsJournal of Information Science, 2004
- The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 1998
- The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1995
- The Iron Law of Important ArticlesSouthern Economic Journal, 1991
- Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1977