How Often Are Diagnostic Features Missed with Less Extensive Histologic Sampling of Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens?
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Vol. 23 (3) , 257-262
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199903000-00002
Abstract
The authors determined whether clinically relevant diagnostic information would be lost by examination of <3 levels per tissue core in prostate needle biopsy specimens. They evaluated 439 consecutive sextant biopsy specimens for the following three histopathologic features: presence of adenocarcinoma involving one core, Gleason pattern 4 in cases of grade 3 + 4 = 7 adenocarcinoma, and perineural invasion (PNI) by carcinoma. For all cases, 3 levels from each involved core were reviewed for the presence or absence of these three features. In 50 cases with adenocarcinoma involving only 1 core, diagnostic carcinoma was present on all 3 levels in 43 cores (86%). Carcinoma was present on only 2 levels in 3 cores (6%), present only on 1 level in 3 cores (6%), and present only on additional cutdowns, not on the original 3 levels in 1 core (2%). Among 32 cases, 51 cores were identified that contained Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7 adenocarcinoma. In 41 cores (80%), pattern 4 was identified in all 3 levels. In 5 cores (10%), pattern 4 was identified on only 2 levels, and in another 5 cores (10%), pattern 4 was present on only 1 level. Among 36 cases, 69 tissue cores were identified that contained perineural invasion (PNI). In 54 cores (78%), PNI was present on all 3 levels. In 7 cores (10%), PNI was present on only 2 of 3 levels, while in 7 other cores (10%), PNI was present on only 1 of 3 levels. In 1 core (1.5%), PNI was noted only on additional cutdowns, not on the original 3 levels. We estimated that reducing the number of levels to 1 per core could result in the misdiagnosis of PNI, grading, or carcinoma in ∼8-11% of cores with these features and could have changed the case diagnosis in 9 of 439 cases. If only 2 levels were reviewed, we predict misdiagnosis in 5% to 6% of cores with these features and a change in the case diagnosis in 5 of 439 cases. Misdiagnosis of clinically relevant features on prostate biopsy specimens can be minimized with histologic review of 3 levels per tissue core.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommendations for Reporting Resected Prostatic CarcinomasPathology Case Reviews, 1998
- Diagnostic Effect of Complete Histologic Sampling of Prostate Needle Biopsy SpecimensAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1998
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Adequate Tissue Sampling of Prostate Core Needle BiopsiesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1997
- Prediction of Capsular Perforation and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1996
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- Sampling of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens:How Much Is Adequate?American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1994
- Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: I. Tissue Sampling ConsiderationsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1992
- Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1990