Guided Bone Regeneration Utilizing Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes in Combination With Submerged and Nonsubmerged Dental Implants in Beagle Dogs
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 69 (5) , 528-535
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.528
Abstract
Treatment of partial and total edentulism with submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants which follows the concept of osseointegration has become an accepted treatment modality. With compromised implant sites, practitioners have begun to combine one-stage implants with established techniques including guided bone regeneration. However, the clinical evaluation of this technique is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and bone regeneration around nonsubmerged or submerged implants placed directly into surgically created osseous defects with or without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes. A total of 24 implants were placed in the mandibles of 4 beagle dogs and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. In group A, nonsubmerged implants were placed into osseous defects and treated with a poncho style ePTFE membrane. These membranes had a hole punched into the center and were slipped over the nonsubmerged implants. In group B, nonsubmerged implants were placed into osseous defects without an ePTFE membrane. In group C, submerged implants were placed into osseous defects and covered with an ePTFE membrane. Histometric measurements of each treatment group were made to determine percent bone gain or loss along the implant surface. Although a number of membrane removals occurred during the healing period, histological analysis indicated osseous ingrowth and osseointegration around nonsubmerged and submerged implants. An overall comparison of the treatment groups with ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences between treatment groups, P > or = 0.05. However, when the data were stratified into sites which retained or lost the ePTFE membrane, the percent of bone regeneration was reduced in group A. Therefore, it may be recommended that nonsubmerged implants be placed with a submerged or "semi-submerged" protocol when utilized in conjunction with ePTFE membranes.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. (II). A cross‐sectional study comparing the clinical outcome 1 year after immediate to standard implant placement.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. I. Rationale, clinical procedures and 30‐month results.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1994
- Healing of implant dehiscence defects with without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: a controlled clinical and histological study and histological studyClinical Oral Implants Research, 1994
- Evaluation of guided bone generation around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogsJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1993
- Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1991
- Tissue integration of non‐submerged implants. l‐year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow‐cylinder and hollow‐screw implants.Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1990
- Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regenerationClinical Oral Implants Research, 1990
- Interface between bone tissue and implants of solid hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implantsBiomaterials, 1989
- A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jawInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981
- Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses:I. Experimental StudiesScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1969