Parenteral vs. enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis of trials using the intention to treat principle
Top Cited Papers
- 9 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (1) , 12-23
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2511-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Review of the True Methodological Quality of Nutritional Support Trials Conducted in the Critically Ill: Time for ImprovementAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2005
- Early developments and clinical applications of total parenteral nutritionJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2003
- Efficacy of albumin in critically ill patientsBMJ, 2003
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Parenteral nutrition in the critically-ill patient: more harm than good?Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2000
- Artificial nutrition after major abdominal surgeryCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- GUT FAILURE—PREDICTOR OF OR CONTRIBUTOR TO MORTALITY IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED BLUNT TRAUMA PATIENTS?Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1994