Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare probing measurements obtained using a newly developed constant force electronic probe, which eliminates errors of visual reading and variable force, to those obtained using a standard periodontal probe. The probe was connected to a digital readout through a linear variable differential transformer; the digital readout was connected to a printer and a foot switch. When the probe was in position and the foot switch depressed, the pocket depth was printed to the nearest 0.1 mm. 12 subjects with minimal to early periodontitis were selected for the study. The pocket depths of each patient were recorded electronically utilizing a constant force of 25 g, and conventionally using the same instrument in a “locked” position and visual reading. Probings were performed on each subject by 3 different examiners, on 3 separate occasions 2–3 days apart. The results showed a high correlation between manual and electronic probing. The average correlations for the 3 investigators between examinations were consistently higher for the electronic probings. In comparing the 3 examiners to each other, consistently higher correlations were found for the electronic pocket readings. Correlations for single‐rooted teeth were lower for all 3 examiners. The pocket depth measurements recorded when using the manual probe with visual readings were consistently deeper than those obtained using the electronic probe with computer readings. It was concluded that the reproducibility of measurements obtained with the electronic probe was significantly superior to that obtained with a manual probe.