Postmodern Social Policy: A Contradiction in Terms?
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Social Policy
- Vol. 25 (3) , 321-346
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279400023631
Abstract
The aim of this article is to present a less negative and more rounded analysis of the potential contribution of postmodernism to social policy than that presented by Taylor-Gooby (1994) in this journal entitled ‘Postmodernism: A Great Leap Backwards?’. It covers four major themes. First, it examines Foucault's ideas on power/knowledge, the body, discipline and surveillance. Second, the article explores the connections between feminism, postmodernism and social policy. Third, it analyses theories of the poststructural state. Fourth, it considers a neglected topic in the subject of space and assesses the contribution of postmodern discourses of spatiality and their relevance to social policy. The article acknowledges the contradiction arising from post-modernism's critique of meta-theory and mainstream social policy's commitment to universalism, but concludes that the answer does not lie in the universal rejection of postmodernism but in the use of the ideas and insights to move the discipline in new directions.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Athens and Jerusalem: a Tale of Three CitiesSocial & Legal Studies, 1994
- Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Great Leap Backwards?Journal of Social Policy, 1994
- Postmodernism, Geography, and the Social Semiotics of SpaceEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1993
- To Boldly go Where no Planners Have Ever …Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1993
- The Woman of Legal DiscourseSocial & Legal Studies, 1992
- "Split at the Roots": A Critique of the Philosophical and Political Sources of Modern Planning DoctrineFrontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 1992
- Between a melanesianist and a deconstructive feministAustralian Feminist Studies, 1989
- Between Modernity and Postmodernity: The Ambiguous Position of US PlanningEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1989
- Postmodernism and PlanningEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1986
- Of Other Spacesdiacritics, 1986