Selection Bias in HMOs: A Review of the Evidence
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Care Research and Review
- Vol. 57 (4) , 405-439
- https://doi.org/10.1177/107755870005700402
Abstract
Early reviews found that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) attracted healthier beneficiaries in the Medicare program and healthier employees in the market for employer-based insurance. This review finds that HMOs still attract healthier Medicare beneficiaries, that HMOs no longer attract healthier employees, and that HMOs attract healthier Medicaid recipients. This review also found conflicting evidence about whether Medicare HMOs are overpaid, no evidence that HMOs are overpaid in the market for employer-based insurance, and evidence that concerns about overpaying Medicaid HMOs have diminished because many states are adopting mandatory programs.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in managed care and managed competition, 1993-1997.Health Affairs, 1999
- Surveying Managed Care Members On Chronic DiseaseHealth Affairs, 1997
- Does Managed Care Lead To Better Or Worse Quality Of Care?Health Affairs, 1997
- The Medicare-HMO Revolving Door — The Healthy Go in and the Sick Go OutNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Evidence for Selective Health Maintenance Organization Enrollment Among Children and Adolescents Covered by MedicaidArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1996
- Risk Adjustment: The Missing Piece of Market CompetitionHealth Affairs, 1996
- Do HMOs Care For The Chronically Ill?Health Affairs, 1995
- The Effects of Capitation on Health and Functional Status of the Medicaid ElderlyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Resource Utilization Among Intensive Care PatientsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992
- Variations in Resource Utilization Among Medical Specialties and Systems of CareJAMA, 1992