Avian Influenza: An Agricultural Perspective
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 194 (s2) , S139-S146
- https://doi.org/10.1086/507561
Abstract
Seasonal influenza continues to have a huge annual impact in the United States, accounting for tens of millions of illnesses, hundreds of thousands of excess hospitalizations, and tens of thousands of excess deaths. Vaccination remains the mainstay for the prevention of influenza. In the United States, 2 types of influenza vaccine are currently licensed: trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine. Both are safe and effective in the populations for which they are approved for use. Children, adults <65 years of age, and the elderly all receive substantial health benefits from vaccination. In addition, vaccination appears to be cost‐effective, if not cost saving, across the age spectrum. Despite long‐standing recommendations for the routine vaccination of persons in high‐priority groups, US vaccination rates remain too low across all age groups. Important issues to be addressed include improving vaccine delivery to current and expanded target groups, ensuring timely availability of adequate vaccine supply, and development of even more effective vaccines. Development of a vaccine against potentially pandemic strains is an essential part of the strategy to control and prevent a pandemic outbreak. The use of existing technologies for influenza vaccine production would be the most straightforward approach, because these technologies are commercially available and licensing would be relatively simple. Approaches currently being tested include subvirion inactivated vaccines and cold‐adapted, live attenuated vaccines. Preliminary results have suggested that, for some pandemic antigens, particularly H5, subvirion inactivated vaccines are poorly immunogenic, for reasons that are not clear. Data from evaluation of live pandemic vaccines are pending. Second‐generation approaches designed to provide improved immune responses at lower doses have focused on adjuvants such as alum and MF59, which are currently licensed for influenza or other vaccines. Additional experimental approaches are required to achieve the ultimate goal for seasonal and pandemic influenza prevention—namely, the ability to generate broadly cross‐reactive and durable protection in humans.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Wild Birds to Blame?Science, 2005
- Transmission of Equine Influenza Virus to DogsScience, 2005
- Highly pathogenic avian influenza (H7N7): Vaccination of zoo birds and transmission to non-poultry speciesVaccine, 2005
- Interregional Transmission of the Internal Protein Genes of H2 Influenza Virus in Migratory Ducks from North America to EurasiaVirus Genes, 2004
- Phylogenetic Analysis of the Hemagglutinin Genes of Twenty-Six Avian Influenza Viruses of Subtype H9N2 Isolated from Chickens in China During 1996–2001Avian Diseases, 2003
- Transmission of Eurasian avian H2 influenza virus to shorebirds in North AmericaJournal of General Virology, 1999
- Multiple genetic reassortment of avian and human influenza A viruses in European pigs, resulting in the emergence of an H1N2 virus of novel genotype.Journal of General Virology, 1998
- Potential for transmission of avian influenza viruses to pigsJournal of General Virology, 1994
- Genetic Reassortment between Avian and Human Influenza A Viruses in Italian PigsVirology, 1993
- Rapid Evolution of RNA GenomesScience, 1982