Fine‐touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis
- 19 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 99 (4) , 864-869
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06685.x
Abstract
To map the fine-touch pressure thresholds of the adult penis in circumcised and uncircumcised men, and to compare the two populations. Adult male volunteers with no history of penile pathology or diabetes were evaluated with a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament touch-test to map the fine-touch pressure thresholds of the penis. Circumcised and uncircumcised men were compared using mixed models for repeated data, controlling for age, type of underwear worn, time since last ejaculation, ethnicity, country of birth, and level of education. The glans of the uncircumcised men had significantly lower mean (sem) pressure thresholds than that of the circumcised men, at 0.161 (0.078) g (P = 0.040) when controlled for age, location of measurement, type of underwear worn, and ethnicity. There were significant differences in pressure thresholds by location on the penis (P < 0.001). The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis was the circumcision scar on the ventral surface. Five locations on the uncircumcised penis that are routinely removed at circumcision had lower pressure thresholds than the ventral scar of the circumcised penis. The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Multinational Population Survey of Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency TimeThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2005
- Premature Ejaculation—Does Country of Origin Tell Us Anything About Etiology?The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2005
- Adult Circumcision Outcomes Study: Effect on Erectile Function, Penile Sensitivity, Sexual Activity and SatisfactionJournal of Urology, 2002
- Effects of Circumcision on Male Sexual Function: Debunking a Myth?Journal of Urology, 2002
- Adult Circumcision Outcomes Study: Effect on Erectile Function, Penile Sensitivity, Sexual Activity and SatisfactionJournal of Urology, 2002
- ERECTILE FUNCTION AFTER ANTERIOR URETHROPLASTYJournal of Urology, 2001
- The prepuceBJU International, 1999
- Circumcision in the United States. Prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practicePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcisionBritish Journal of Urology, 1996
- The Cutaneous Innervation of Human Newborn Prepuce1Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1956