Abstract
Process analysis of Rorschach material was defined, illustrated, and used to delineate differences between the nature of data obtained in different varieties of diagnostic assay. It was suggested that failure to take into account distinct differences in sources for data contributed to confusion about diagnostic decisions among different disciplines. The Rorschach experience may allow symbol formation to take place, whereas, in interview techniques, symbolic inferences are made from a subject's answers to questions about formal adaptivity. Identification of the processes that surround a subject's conscious reactions to the formation of a symbol may sharpen our awareness about a subject's inner state. Optimal use of both psychiatric and projective data should include a clear understanding of the differences in the nature of the materials obtained and their sources. Attention to these parameters may improve our decisions and predictions.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: