Long-term benefits of an early invasive management in acute coronary syndromes depend on intracoronary stenting and aggressive antiplatelet treatment: A metaregression
- 31 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 149 (3) , 504-511
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.026
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Timing of Angiography and Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndromes:Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2004
- Invasive therapy along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and intracoronary stents improves survival in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis and review of the literatureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Selection of coronary stentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- A Time‐to‐Treatment Analysis in the Medicine Versus Angiography in Thrombolytic Exclusion (MATE) TrialJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2001
- Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock—(S)MASHEuropean Heart Journal, 1999
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986