How Well do Venture Capital Databases Reflect Actual Investments?
- 1 September 2002
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Researchers increasingly have used the two primary venture capital databases - VentureOne and Venture Economics - to study venture capital (VC) financings. These data are largely self-reported. In this paper, we compare the actual contracts in 143 VC financings to their characterizations in the databases. The databases exclude roughly 15% of the financing rounds. The Venture Economics database oversamples larger rounds and California companies while the financing rounds included in the VentureOne database exhibit no significant bias. The databases provide unbiased, but noisy measures of financing amounts and their valuations. The databases also are less successful in measuring milestone rounds. The VentureOne database oversamples valuations for highly valued firms even controlling for firm characteristics. We discuss the implications of these findings for researchers and practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Net value: wealth creation (and destruction) during the internet boomJournal of Corporate Finance, 2004
- The Risk and Return of Venture CapitalPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2001
- Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuationsJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture CapitalThe Journal of Finance, 1995