THE MAJOR TRAUMA MANAGEMENT STUDY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF CURRENT TRAUMA CARE
- 21 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 68 (1) , 50-57
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04637.x
Abstract
Background: An audit of the management and outcome of major trauma patients was carried out to determine ways in which the system of care may be improved. Methods: The Major Trauma Management Study (MTMS) collected data prospectively on all consecutively admitted major trauma patients at eight major hospitals during a 12‐month period. Outcome was studied using trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) and a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) analyses, as well as a preventable outcome analysis, which looked at survivors with complications or with a Glasgow Coma Score < 15 on discharge from hospital, as well as studying deaths. Results: The group of 859 patients was more severely injured than most described previously, with a mortality of 14.8% and a mean injury severity score of 19.8. Formal ASCOT analysis indicated 2.25% fewer survivors than would be predicted by Major Trauma Outcome Study norms. Extrapolating the TRISS and ASCOT process to include those patients with missing data, and then comparing groups of matched severity with the norms, gave no statistically different outcome in the MTMS group of patients. Preventable outcome analysis revealed rates of preventable and potentially preventable (P/PP) outcomes of 32% among deaths and 8% among survivors. The types of management deficiencies responsible for P/PP outcomes are identified. Conclusions: The points of deficiency in a system of care have been identified, and the development of an integrated trauma system in Victoria, based upon these facts, is recommended. Children, the elderly, patients with head injuries and patients being transferred between hospitals would benefit from improvements to the system of care. The calculation of efficacy rate (0.95 for the MTMS patients) is recommended to accurately assess the system of care. Preventable Outcome Analysis is more relevant to auditing a system of trauma care in detail, than is ASCOT or TRISS. The MTMS has refined and defined the process so that it is reproducible in further comparative studies.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Predictions from A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1996
- TRISS UNEXPECTED SURVIVORS-A STATISTICAL PHENOMENON OR A CLINICAL REALITY?Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1992
- Results of a Multi-Institutional Outcome AssessmentPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1992
- Revision of TRISS for Intubated PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1992
- Validity of Applying Adult TRISS Analysis to Injured ChildrenPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991
- Limitations of the TRISS Method for Interhospital ComparisonsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991
- The Major Trauma Outcome StudyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1990
- PREVENTABLE CAUSES OF DEATH AND DISABILITY FROM NEUROTRAUMAAnz Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Trauma mortality in Orange County: The effect of implementation of a regional trauma systemAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1984
- RESUSCITATION AND SURVIVAL IN MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1969