Comparison between theIn VitroFlow Dynamics of the Standard and the Convexo-Concave Björk-Shiley Tilting Disc Valve Prostheses

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the new convexo-concave model of the Björk-Shiley prosthesis the disc pivots 2.5 mm downstream, creating a space between the disc and the ring when the disc tilts open. Its flow dynamics were compared with those of the standard model under steady flow rates 0–321/min of a water-glycerin mixture employed as blood-analogous test fluid. The following results are valid for corresponding sizes of the conventionally used 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 and 31 mm prosthetic valves of the two models. The transprosthetic pressure fall varied directly, but in a parabolic fashion with the steady flow rate for all the partial and full flow orifices. The resistance to flow 0–32 1/min for the full flow orifice of the convexo-concave prosthesis was in average 16% lower than that of the standard model, with highly significant differences for the 21 and 23 mm prostheses (p < 0.001). There was a redistribution of flow towards the smaller prosthetic opening from 23% (S.D. ±1.4) for the standard model to 30% (S.D.±2.4) for the convexo-concave model (p < 0.001). The minimum steady flow rate required to maintain the convexo-concave disc in completely open position (60 ml/sec) was only half that (37–50%) required for the standard disc (125 ml/sec) (p < 0.001). Regurgitation through the closed prosthesis varied directly and linearly with the driving pressure and was slightly but definitely lower with the convexo-concave model than with standard model. The main features of the new design are decreased resistance to flow, redistribution of the flow within the prosthesis in order to prevent stasis along its smaller orifice, diminished opening resistance and reduced regurgitation. It is concluded that the flow dynamics of the convexo-concave model Björk-Shiley prosthesis constitute a significant improvement over those of the standard model.

This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit: