Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythm patterns

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Listeners discriminated between 6-tone rhythmic patterns that differed only in the delay of the temporal position of one of the tones. On each trial, feedback was given and the subject’s performance determined the amount of delay on the next trial. The 6 tones of the patterns marked off 5 intervals. In the first experiment, patterns comprised 3 “short” and 2 “long” intervals: 12121, 21121, and so forth, where the long (2) was twice the length of a short (1). In the second experiment, patterns were the complements of the patterns in the first experiment and comprised 2 shorts and 3 longs: 21212, 12212, and so forth. Each pattern was tested 45 times (5 positions of the delayed tone × 3 tempos × 3 replications). Consistent with previous work on simple interval discrimination, absolute discrimination (Δt in milliseconds) was poorer the longer the intervals (i.e., the slower the tempo). Measures of relative discrimination (Δt/t,wheret was the short interval, the long interval, or the average of 2 intervals surrounding the delayed tone) were better the slower the tempo. Beyond these global results, large interactions of pattern with position of the delayed tone and tempo suggest that different models of performance are needed to explain behavior at the different tempos. A Weber’s law model fit the slow-tempo data better than did a model based on positions of “natural accent” (Povel & Essens, 1985).

This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit: