How Specific is the Shape Bias?
- 13 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Child Development
- Vol. 74 (1) , 168-178
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00528
Abstract
Children tend to extend object names on the basis of sameness of shape, rather than size, color, or material––a tendency that has been dubbed the “shape bias.” Is the shape bias the result of well–learned associations between words and objects? Or does it exist because of a general belief that shape is a good indicator of object category membership? The present three studies addressed this debate by exploring whether the shape bias is specific to naming. In Study 1, 3–year–olds showed the shape bias both when asked to extend a novel name and when asked to select an object of the same kind as a target object. Study 2 found the same shape bias when children were asked to generalize properties relevant to category membership. Study 3 replicated the findings from Study 1 with 2–year–olds. These findings suggest that the shape bias derives from children's beliefs about object kinds and is not the product of associative learning.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Children Learn the Meanings of WordsPublished by MIT Press ,2000
- Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial RepresentationsPsychological Science, 1998
- Conceptual and linguistic biases in children's word learning.Developmental Psychology, 1998
- Do Words Facilitate Object Categorization in 9-Month-Old Infants?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1997
- Intention, history, and artifact conceptsCognition, 1996
- The Dynamics of Preschoolers' Categorization ChoicesChild Development, 1996
- Early referential understanding: Infants' ability to recognize referential acts for what they are.Developmental Psychology, 1993
- Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumptionJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1992
- Infants' Contribution to the Achievement of Joint ReferenceChild Development, 1991
- Children's use of shape in extending novel labels to animate objects: Identity versus postural changeCognitive Development, 1991