Hypothesis Testing with Scanner Data: The Advantage of Bayesian Methods
Open Access
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 27 (4) , 379-389
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700401
Abstract
The author presents a Bayesian method of testing possibly non-nested restrictions in a multivariate linear model and, using store-level scanner data, compares it with classical methods. The Bayesian tests are shown to be either equal or superior to classical tests in terms of objectivity, ease of use, and ease of interpretation. Classical tests lack a natural metric for comparing non-nested models and often employ super models in which the entertained hypotheses are special cases (i.e., nested). Nested classical tests are almost always significant when used with scanner data, making their interpretation problematic. In contrast, large samples cause Bayesian methods to become less dependent on subjective aspects of the prior distribution and therefore more objective.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling Asymmetric CompetitionMarketing Science, 1988
- Antithetic acceleration of Monte Carlo integration in Bayesian inferenceJournal of Econometrics, 1988
- Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map from Panel DataMarketing Science, 1988
- A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price SensitivitiesMarketing Science, 1988
- Comparison of alternative functional forms in productionJournal of Econometrics, 1985
- Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product PurchasesMarketing Science, 1985
- A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner DataMarketing Science, 1983
- Multiple model testing for non-nested heteroskedastic censored regression modelsJournal of Econometrics, 1983
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974
- The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location ParametersThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1971