Commentary. Are current tumour response criteria relevant for the 21st century?
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 73 (874) , 1031-1033
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.874.11271893
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Molecular Imaging: Exploring the Next FrontierRadiology, 1999
- Novel anticancer drug discoveryCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology, 1999
- FDG uptake, tumour characteristics and response to therapyNuclear Medicine Communications, 1998
- Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Positron emission tomography: A new investigational area for cancer researchClinical Oncology, 1996
- Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other diseaseNature Medicine, 1995
- CT estimations of mean attenuation values and volume in testicular tumors: a comparison with surgical and histologic findings.Radiology, 1982
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumorsCancer, 1980