Do Get-Out-the-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- forum
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 99 (2) , 283-300
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051658
Abstract
In their landmark study of a field experiment, Gerber and Green (2000) found that get-out-the-vote calls reduce turnout by five percentage points. In this article, I introduce statistical methods that can uncover discrepancies between experimental design and actual implementation. The application of this methodology shows that Gerber and Green's negative finding is caused by inadvertent deviations from their stated experimental protocol. The initial discovery led to revisions of the original data by the authors and retraction of the numerical results in their article. Analysis of their revised data, however, reveals new systematic patterns of implementation errors. Indeed, treatment assignments of the revised data appear to be even less randomized than before their corrections. To adjust for these problems, I employ a more appropriate statistical method and demonstrate that telephone canvassing increases turnout by five percentage points. This article demonstrates how statistical methods can find and correct complications of field experiments.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training ProgramsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Bounds on Treatment Effects From Studies With Imperfect ComplianceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment IntensityJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogeneous Explanatory Variable is WeakJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Generalized Linear ModelsPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity ScoreThe American Statistician, 1985
- Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity ScoreThe American Statistician, 1985