A quasi‐exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases
- 19 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 21 (6) , 943-956
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1053
Abstract
In this paper we propose a quasi‐exact alternative to the exact unconditional method by Chan and Zhang (1999) estimating confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases. The quasi‐exact method is an approximation to a modified version of Chan and Zhang's method, where the two‐sided p‐value of an observation is defined by adding to the one‐sided p‐value the sum of all probabilities of more ‘extreme’ events in the unobserved tail. We show that distinctively less conservative interval estimates can be derived following the modified definition of the two‐sided p‐value. The approximations applied in the quasi‐exact method help to simplify the computations greatly, while the resulting infringements to the nominal level are low. Compared with other approximate methods, including the mid‐p quasi‐exact methods and the Miettinen and Nurminen (M&N) asymptotic method, our quasi‐exact method demonstrates much better reliability in small sample cases. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Test‐Based Exact Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial ProportionsBiometrics, 1999
- Mid-P Confidence Intervals: A Brief ReviewJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1995
- Invariant small sample confidence intervals for the difference of two success probabilitiesCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1993
- Small sample confidence intervals for the difference,ratio and odds ratio of two success probabilitiesCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1993
- CommentStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Exact Properties of Some Exact Test Statistics for Comparing Two Binomial ProportionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1990
- Comparative analysis of two ratesStatistics in Medicine, 1985
- Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for p 1 - p 2 and p 1 /p 2 in 2 × 2 Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- A Table of Exact Confidence Limits for Differences and Ratios of Two Proportions and Their Odds RatiosJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977
- EXTENSION OF THE NEYMAN-PEARSON THEORY OF TESTS TO DISCONTINUOUS VARIATESBiometrika, 1950