Has Funding Made a Difference to Research Methods?
Open Access
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Research Online
- Vol. 1 (1) , 69-79
- https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.7
Abstract
It has been argued that foundation funding has distorted methods in American sociology in the direction of quantification. This argument rests on a number of assumptions, of which the key one is that in the absence of such funding, method would have developed differently. Data on the methods of funded and unfunded research articles are analysed, and show that the trend to increasing levels of quantification is almost equally present in unfunded work, which suggests that funding should not be held responsible for the trend.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The origins of ‘mainstream sociology’ and other issues in the history of American sociologySocial Epistemology, 1994
- Fundamental Development of the Social SciencesPublished by University of Michigan Library ,1993
- Philanthropy and social science in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller memorial, 1922–29Minerva, 1981
- American Philanthropy and the Social Sciences in Britain, 1919–1939; The Reproduction of a Conservative IdeologySociological Review, 1980
- Government Influence on the Social Science ParadigmThe Sociological Quarterly, 1976
- The Politics of American SociologistsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972
- Creating local social science data archivesSocial Science Information, 1970
- In Memoriam: Samuel Andrew Stouffer, 1900-1960American Journal of Sociology, 1961
- The Social Sciences and the National Science Foundation: 1945-1955American Sociological Review, 1955
- The National Science Foundation and Social Science ResearchAmerican Sociological Review, 1954