Comparison of plasma sample purification by manual liquid–liquid extraction, automated 96-well liquid–liquid extraction and automated 96-well solid-phase extraction for analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry
- 17 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications
- Vol. 732 (2) , 501-508
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(99)00323-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The need for adequate chromatographic separation in the quantitative determination of drugs in biological samples by high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometryRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1999
- The use of high-flow high performance liquid chromatography coupled with positive and negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for quantitative bioanalysis via direct injection of the plasma/serum samplesRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1998
- Use of generic fast gradient liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy in quantitative bioanalysisJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1998
- High throughput liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry bioanalysis using 96-well disk solid phase extraction plate for the sample preparationRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1998
- Automated 96-well solid phase extraction for the determination of doramectin in cattle plasmaJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1998
- The use of turbulent flow chromatography/mass spectrometry for the rapid, direct analysis of a novel pharmaceutical compound in plasmaRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1997
- The Use of Automated Solid Phase Extraction in the '96 well' Format for High Throughput Bioanalysis using Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass SpectrometryRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1996